Secure.gov websites use HTTPS A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// suggests you’ve safely linked to the.gov site. Share delicate information only on authorities, secure websites.

- About - The Chief law officer

• Organizational Chart
• Budget & Performance
• History
• Privacy Program
  hubspot.com
  - Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos
• Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Why Justice?
• Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies
• Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  Utilities
  
  - About About
  
  Our Work
  
  - Contact the Division the Division
  
  Report a Violation
  
  - Cases and Matters
• Press Room Press Room
  
  Videos
  
  Publications
  
  - Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
  
  Experienced Professionals
  
  Attorney general of the United States ´ s Honors Program
  
  Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
  
  - Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Rights FOIA
  
  Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
  
  - En español
  
  - About - title=” About” About
• The Attorney General
• Organizational Chart
• Budget & Performance
• History - Privacy Program
  
  - title=” News” News - Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos
• Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - title=” Guidance & Resources” Resources
• Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Employment
• Why Justice?
• Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies
• Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  - Our Offices
• Find Help
• Contact Us
  
  Breadcrumb
  
  1. Justice.gov
• Civil Rights Division
• The Fair Housing Act
  
  The Fair Housing Act
  
  - Facebook
• X.
• LinkedIn.
• Email
  
  The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., restricts discrimination by direct providers of housing, such as proprietors and real estate companies in addition to other entities, such as municipalities, banks or other loan provider and homeowners insurer whose prejudiced practices make housing not available to persons since of:
  
  race or color. faith. sex. national origin. familial status, or. impairment.
  
  In cases including discrimination in mortgage loans or home improvement loans, the Department might submit match under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is proof of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a denial of rights to a group of individuals raises an issue of basic public significance. Where force or danger of force is used to deny or interfere with fair housing rights, the Department of Justice might set up criminal procedures. The Fair Housing Act likewise supplies treatments for dealing with individual problems of discrimination. Individuals who believe that they have actually been victims of an illegal housing practice, might submit a grievance with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or file their own suit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings suits on behalf of individuals based on recommendations from HUD.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
  
  One of the central objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to restrict race discrimination in sales and rentals of housing. Nevertheless, more than 30 years later, race discrimination in housing continues to be a problem. The bulk of the Justice Department’s pattern or practice cases include claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing providers try to camouflage their discrimination by giving false details about accessibility of housing, either stating that absolutely nothing was readily available or steering homeseekers to particular areas based upon race. Individuals who receive such false details or misdirection may have no knowledge that they have been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has actually brought numerous cases alleging this kind of discrimination based on race or color. In addition, the Department’s Fair Housing Testing Program looks for to uncover this sort of surprise discrimination and hold those responsible accountable. Most of the mortgage lending cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually alleged discrimination based on race or color. A few of the Department’s cases have actually also alleged that towns and other city government entities violated the Fair Housing Act when they denied permits or zoning changes for housing developments, or relegated them to mainly minority areas, since the potential citizens were anticipated to be predominantly African-Americans.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
  
  The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination in housing based upon religious beliefs. This restriction covers circumstances of obvious discrimination versus members of a specific religion too less direct actions, such as zoning regulations developed to limit the use of personal homes as a places of worship. The variety of cases submitted given that 1968 alleging religious discrimination is little in comparison to some of the other restricted bases, such as race or national origin. The Act does consist of a minimal exception that permits non-commercial housing run by a religious company to reserve such housing to persons of the very same religion.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Unwanted Sexual Advances
  
  The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. In the last few years, the Department’s focus in this location has actually been to challenge unwanted sexual advances in housing. Women, particularly those who are poor, and with limited housing options, often have little option but to endure the humiliation and deterioration of sexual harassment or danger having their families and themselves removed from their homes. The Department’s enforcement program is targeted at proprietors who produce an illogical living environment by demanding sexual favors from occupants or by creating a sexually hostile environment for them. In this way we look for both to get relief for renters who have actually been treated unjustly by a property manager due to the fact that of sex and likewise deter other potential abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without facing repercussions. In addition, rates discrimination in mortgage loaning might also negatively affect ladies, particularly minority ladies. This type of discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
  
  The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination based upon national origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the nation of a person’s birth or where his or her ancestors originated. Census data indicate that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing section of our nation’s population. The Justice Department has taken enforcement action versus municipal federal governments that have tried to reduce or limit the number of Hispanic families that may reside in their communities. We have actually sued lenders under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have enforced more rigid underwriting requirements on mortgage or made loans on less beneficial terms for Hispanic debtors. The Department has also sued lending institutions for discrimination against Native Americans. Other locations of the country have actually experienced an increasing diversity of nationwide origin groups within their populations. This consists of new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the former Soviet Union, and other parts of Eastern Europe. We have actually taken action against personal property owners who have victimized such people.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
  
  The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, forbids discrimination in housing versus families with kids under 18. In addition to restricting a straight-out denial of housing to households with children, the Act also avoids housing service providers from enforcing any unique requirements or conditions on renters with custody of kids. For instance, landlords may not find families with kids in any single portion of a complex, put an unreasonable restriction on the total number of individuals who may reside in a dwelling, or restrict their access to leisure services offered to other occupants. In the majority of instances, the modified Fair Housing Act restricts a housing supplier from refusing to rent or offer to households with kids. However, some centers may be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This type of housing, which fulfills the requirements set forth in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, may run as “senior” housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has published policies and extra guidance detailing these statutory requirements.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
  
  The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination on the basis of special needs in all kinds of housing transactions. The Act defines individuals with an impairment to mean those individuals with psychological or physical disabilities that considerably restrict one or more major life activities. The term psychological or physical impairment may include conditions such as loss of sight, hearing impairment, movement impairment, HIV infection, mental retardation, alcoholism, drug addiction, chronic tiredness, finding out special needs, head injury, and psychological disease. The term major life activity might include seeing, hearing, strolling, breathing, carrying out manual tasks, taking care of one’s self, discovering, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also safeguards persons who have a record of such a problems, or are considered having such an impairment. Current users of unlawful illegal drugs, individuals founded guilty for unlawful manufacture or circulation of an illegal drug, sex transgressors, and juvenile wrongdoers are ruled out disabled under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act pays for no defenses to people with or without specials needs who provide a direct risk to the persons or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether somebody poses such a direct hazard must be made on a personalized basis, however, and can not be based on general assumptions or speculation about the nature of an impairment. The Division’s enforcement of the Fair Housing Act’s protections for individuals with disabilities has focused on two significant areas. One is insuring that zoning and other policies concerning land usage are not used to prevent the residential choices of these people, including unnecessarily restricting common, or gather, domestic arrangements, such as group homes. The 2nd location is guaranteeing that newly built multifamily housing is integrated in accordance with the Fair Housing Act’s ease of access requirements so that it is available to and functional by individuals with disabilities, and, in specific, those who use wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that forbid discrimination against individuals with specials needs, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is enforced by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
  
  Some individuals with disabilities may cohabit in congregate living arrangements, frequently referred to as “group homes.” The Fair Housing Act forbids towns and other regional government entities from making zoning or land usage choices or executing land use policies that leave out or otherwise discriminate versus people with specials needs. The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal--
  
  - To use land use policies or actions that treat groups of individuals with impairments less positively than groups of non-disabled persons. An example would be a regulation prohibiting housing for individuals with specials needs or a specific kind of special needs, such as psychological disease, from finding in a particular area, while permitting other groups of unassociated people to cohabit because area.
• To act versus, or deny a license, for a home due to the fact that of the impairment of people who live or would live there. An example would be denying a building authorization for a home due to the fact that it was planned to supply housing for persons with mental retardation.
• To decline to make reasonable accommodations in land usage and zoning policies and procedures where such accommodations might be needed to manage individuals or groups of persons with disabilities an equivalent chance to use and enjoy housing. What constitutes a reasonable lodging is a case-by-case decision. Not all asked for adjustments of rules or policies are reasonable. If an asked for modification enforces an undue financial or administrative burden on a local federal government, or if an adjustment produces a fundamental modification in a city government’s land use and zoning plan, it is not a “affordable” lodging.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
  
  The Fair Housing Act specifies discrimination in housing against individuals with disabilities to consist of a failure “to develop and construct” certain brand-new multi-family homes so that they are accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities, and particularly individuals who use wheelchairs. The Act requires all recently constructed multi-family houses of four or more units meant for first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have specific functions: an available entryway on an available path, available typical and public use locations, doors sufficiently broad to accommodate wheelchairs, available routes into and through each dwelling, light switches, electric outlets, and thermostats in available location, supports in bathroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and usable kitchen areas and restrooms configured so that a wheelchair can steer about the space.
  
  Developers, home builders, owners, and architects accountable for the style or building and construction of brand-new multi-family housing might be held responsible under the Fair Housing Act if their buildings stop working to satisfy these design requirements. The Department of Justice has brought lots of enforcement actions against those who failed to do so. Most of the cases have actually been resolved by consent decrees offering a range of kinds of relief, consisting of: retrofitting to bring unattainable functions into compliance where feasible and where it is not-- alternatives (monetary funds or other construction requirements) that will provide for making other housing units available